When it comes to Sino-Australian relations, the elephant in the room is iron ore and the reasons are clear.
China’s military industrial complex is totally reliant on the Australian iron ore that goes into their coal-powered steel making blast furnaces.
Although China mines around 900 million tonnes of iron ore every year domestically, their producers are high-cost, unreliable, environmentally irresponsible and produce ores of a much lower quality relative to Australian deposits.
Even worse for China is the situation in Africa.
As part of their Belt and Road Initiative, China has been throwing billions at African iron ore projects, most notably the Simandou mine in Guinea to reduce reliance on Australia.
However, ignoring all the hype peddled about the new project, the mine’s initial production phase is expected to be about 100 million tonnes a year, or about two-thirds the output of Australia’s Fortescue Metals Group alone.
In other words, it’s nowhere near large enough to materially transform the global iron ore market nor free China from its dependence on Australia.
So, what’s ADVANCE’s point with all of this?
Australia has serious leverage over Xi Jinping’s regime, and we’d be bloody idiots not to use it.
Afterall, the Chinese have imposed a 212 per cent tariff on our wine, an 80 per cent tariff on our barley, and countless other tariffs on our coal, copper, beef, cotton, wood and lobster industries; and Australia’s only response has been to whinge, whine and complain to the World Trade Organisation.
Instead, our politicians should play tit-for-tat, retaliate and set a clear precedent that the Australian people won’t just cop a punch in the face without having a swing back.
This is exactly what Senator Matt Canavan has been calling for over the last year or so.
“Anytime China imposes a cost on our jobs and our industries through illegal trade actions, China is going to pay the bill. We can do that with a levy on iron ore exports because they need our iron ore, there’s no alternative,” Senator Canavan told Nine News last night.
Managing Director of Tyrell Wines, Bruce Tyrell agreed.
“I have said to our people, if you have the choice of buying something that isn’t Chinese, you should probably buy it, given they’re refusing to buy our product,” he said.
“We need to reciprocate. Retribution is one way of putting it. If we’re not given access to that market, we’ll withdraw our little bit of access here. It’s a bit of old-fashioned tit-for-tat. But if someone keeps punching you in the nose every day, you don’t give them a free lunch.”
Good on you, Bruce!
Although the journalists at the ABC wouldn’t understand, the impact of a tariff on our iron ore to China would be profound.
Without Aussie iron ore, China’s steelmakers will have to scale down production, rendering them unprofitable due to loss of economies of scale.
If the cost of steel goes up in China, the rate at which the CCP can produce warships, warplanes, missiles and armaments will decline, giving the West some breathing space to catch up.
Even worse for Xi, an increase in the cost of steel will drive internal inflation, further reducing the illegitimacy of his regime in the face of the increasingly wise Chinese middle class, who are by no means thrilled about the instability of their property market following the collapse of Evergrande.
It's time to make a move, before Australia gets too much of a reputation for being soft.
Until Xi Jinping follows the rules set out by the World Trade Organisation and the Chinese-Australia Free Trade Agreement that forbids the imposition of tariffs for political reasons, the Prime Minister must place a levy on our iron ore exports to show we’re not a country that’ll just roll over when pushed around…
Do you like this page?